Saturday, March 25, 2023

Not ‘Poor Art’

A New York district court has held that “great artist” Robert Indiana did not license and “had nothing whatsoever to do with” the “poor art” created by another artist, and that Indiana did not make any misrepresentations to a buyer about this work or any other matter.

The case is Tovar v. Indiana.


Tags: , , , , , ,


No comments so far.
  • Leave a Reply
    Your gravatar
    Your Name


Clancco, Clancco: The Source for Art & Law,, and Art & Law are trademarks owned by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento. The views expressed on this site are those of Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento and of the artists and writers who submit to They are not the views of any other organization, legal or otherwise. All content contained on or made available through is not intended to and does not constitute legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is formed, nor is anything submitted to treated as confidential.

Website Terms of Use, Privacy, and Applicable Law.

Switch to our mobile site