Friday, December 1, 2023

Monkey selfie lawsuit lives on (UPDATE)


Just when Naruto thought he was out, they pull him back in!

Yes, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has refused to dismiss the case and will be issuing an official appellate decision. The Court points out that it does not have to dismiss a case simply because the parties settle. The Court also notes that Naruto (presumably a key plaintiff) was not a party to the settlement, so the Court believes PETA, suing on behalf of Naruto, was up to something.

The Ninth Circuit’s denial of the parties’ motion to dismiss is available here. Interestingly, this past February WIPO Magazine put out an article on the “Monkey Selfie” and copyright law, Can the monkey selfie case teach us anything about copyright law?

UPDATE: May 1, 2018

The Ninth Circuit has weighed in: Animals can’t bring a copyright infringement lawsuit, and PETA has to pay Slater’s attorney’s fees.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,


No comments so far.

Clancco, Clancco: The Source for Art & Law,, and Art & Law are trademarks owned by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento. The views expressed on this site are those of Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento and of the artists and writers who submit to They are not the views of any other organization, legal or otherwise. All content contained on or made available through is not intended to and does not constitute legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is formed, nor is anything submitted to treated as confidential.

Website Terms of Use, Privacy, and Applicable Law.

Switch to our mobile site