Monday, April 29, 2024
 

Can You Copyright a Phrase In Neon?


Kelly Mark. I Called Shotgun Infinity When I Was Twelve - 2006 Neon, transformers & acrylic.

Kelly Mark. I Called Shotgun Infinity When I Was Twelve – 2006
Neon, transformers & acrylic.

Apparently, artist Kelly Mark thinks so. But can you? Not sure about Canadian copyright law, but as some of our readers well-know by now, short phrases are most likely not protected by U.S. copyright laws, especially when the arrangement is done in what one could describe as a generic layout and font style. Thoughts?

More on this story here.

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Comments: 3

Leave a reply »

 
  • Never heard those words put together quite like that before. Isn’t poetry copyrightable no matter how short it is?

     
     
     
  • Matt

    Over simplifying a bit, but the Canadian standard is that a work must be the product of an exercise of skill and judgment on the part of the author in order to qualify for copyright protection. Most short works probably don’t meet this standard. I can’t think of any cases dealing directly with really short works off the top of my head, but there are cases that say that titles by themselves aren’t typically entitled to copyright protection. And what is a title by itself if not a short work? So I’d think that this phrase on its own would not be found to be entitled to copyright infringement.

    The question would then be whether the arrangement involved a sufficient exercise of skill and judgment to earn it copyright protection. I would say arranging things in a generic fashion would not be enough. So it comes down to… is this a generic arrangement? There doesn’t seem to be anything particularly original about it to me, but maybe a determined plaintiff could find a visual designer expert witness to say differently.

    At least that’s my off-the-cuff, coffee break view of things.

     
     
     
  • Paul

    Missing the point. No one is claiming to ‘copyright (a noun not a verb by the way) a phrase in neon.’ Its not the words themselves that merit protection– someone may want to put them on a sweatshirt and that’s fine. It’s the way it is put together, as a whole work of art: the composition, the material, the color, etc. It would be news to artists like Tracy Emin, Noble + Webster, Glenn Ligon and many more that someone could take their neon-text works and copy them without fear of legal consequence. The suggestion that art that uses text as an element may not be protected by copyright would be news to Ed Ruscha and Lawrence Weiner.

     
     
     
  • Leave a Reply
     
    Your gravatar
    Your Name
     
     
     

     
     
 
Legal

Clancco, Clancco: The Source for Art & Law, Clancco.com, and Art & Law are trademarks owned by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento. The views expressed on this site are those of Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento and of the artists and writers who submit to Clancco.com. They are not the views of any other organization, legal or otherwise. All content contained on or made available through Clancco.com is not intended to and does not constitute legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is formed, nor is anything submitted to Clancco.com treated as confidential.

Website Terms of Use, Privacy, and Applicable Law.
 

Switch to our mobile site