Friday, May 29, 2020
 

Are Judges the New Art Critics?


I’ve been posing this question for a few years now, and my answer to that question, “yes,” has been validated by Judge Batts in the Cariou v. Prince district court decision.When Batts asked Prince why he thought a particular image was worth appropriating, she did what many in the so-called art world have ceased to do, she asked “why?”

The Wall Street Journal’s Eric Felten takes on this question via recent legal cases involving Richard Prince, Cady Noland, and Sol Lewitt.

Judges aren’t necessarily bad at making aesthetic judgments (though goodness knows plenty are). Jonathan Gilmore, who teaches philosophy of art at Yale, credits courts for dealing with aesthetic issues in a way that can be more thorough than the ivory-tower boys, because “a court is required to make explicit its reasoning.”

 

Tags: , , , , ,

Comments

No comments so far.
  • Leave a Reply
     
    Your gravatar
    Your Name
     
     
     

     
     
 
Legal

Clancco, Clancco: The Source for Art & Law, Clancco.com, and Art & Law are trademarks owned by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento. The views expressed on this site are those of Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento and of the artists and writers who submit to Clancco.com. They are not the views of any other organization, legal or otherwise. All content contained on or made available through Clancco.com is not intended to and does not constitute legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is formed, nor is anything submitted to Clancco.com treated as confidential.

Website Terms of Use, Privacy, and Applicable Law.
 

Switch to our mobile site