Thursday, November 27, 2014
 

Ninth Circuit Reverses Barbie Decision; Orders New Trial

bratzI was just commenting on this subject this week. Well, two related subjects actually. One, that the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is, well, on its own circuit, and two, on the Mattel vs. MGA litigation (aka- Barbie vs. Bratz) and the need for clear work-for-hire agreements.

Lo and behold, today, in a stunning reversal worthy of a Boston Legal episode, today, a three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit quashed an injunction that had prevented MGA from selling the dolls and said a new trial is likely because of flawed jury instructions at the original district court proceeding. The opinion, written by chief circuit Judge Alex Kozinski, asserts that because of errors in jury instructions, the entire case will need be retried. You can read more on this story and download the opinion at The American Law Daily. This is stunning. You can read the background as well as related drama here. According to the blog, Las Vegas Trademark Attorney, “for copyright fans, the decision also includes an interesting discussion regarding the fine line between copyrightable expression and unprotectable ideas.” Will the madness ever end?

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

No comments so far.
 
Legal

Clancco, Clancco: The Source for Art & Law, Clancco.com, and Art & Law are trademarks owned by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento. The views expressed on this site are those of Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento and of the artists and writers who submit to Clancco.com. They are not the views of any other organization, legal or otherwise. All content contained on or made available through Clancco.com is not intended to and does not constitute legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is formed, nor is anything submitted to Clancco.com treated as confidential.

Website Terms of Use, Privacy, and Applicable Law.
 

Switch to our mobile site