“In current litigation against Prince, it’s less clear that significant changes or additions have been made.”
October 21st, 2018 by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
Images in question in the Graham v. Prince copyright infringement case.
Here’s another article on appropriation art and fair use that seems to believe, or at least wish, that this type of practice is some grand avant-garde performance, radical to the bourgeoisie.
Posted in Copyright, Feature | Comments Off on “In current litigation against Prince, it’s less clear that significant changes or additions have been made.”
Previous post: Whiners: “Don’t let bad art spoil our environment.”
Next post: Balenciaga sued for copying CAR-FRESHNER’s tree design