The Sexiness of Law in Art and Fashion

The sexiness of law has been here for some time, certainly in art as witnessed in the work of some contemporary artists. Lay folk like this (both makers and receivers); it’s their way of “addressing” law without really having to dig into the dirt and grime that the understanding of law requires. Everyone has their thoughts on abortion, immigration, affirmative action and of course, our little darling, appropriation. But how many of these artists or lay folk actually take the time to investigate the structures of law and power? Not many. And why should they when the likes of NPR and the NY Times arts section makes one feel as if they understand Suprematism or stare decisis?

So why would we expect the industry of fashion to be any different? We don’t, or we shouldn’t. After all, it is the industry of what is superficially cool and stylish. But this is why fashion can allow itself to be more superficial and thus represent law with a more glamorous approach. Take a look at this article by The Fashion Law and judge for yourself. Good, better, or just as bad?

Tags: appropriation of law, art, Art Law, Copyright, fashion, Trademark