Thursday, April 25, 2019
 

Grey Areas in Fair Use Defense Continuously Confuse Artists


Products featuring George Bush’s artwork have been removed from the Society6 webpage. Mashable suggests, per Cariou v. Prince, the artist of the Bush inspired works could argue fair use. Just as a start to addressing this problematic assumption, the idea seems to ignore the fact that Prince’s work was found to be “transformative” whereas the Bush inspired works are merely prints of the paintings on various goods for commercial use. Likewise, Fair Use is an affirmative defense, meaning a maker must first be sued before they can attempt to argue it.

That being said, a closer examination of statues and proper reading of case law should be completed before artists rely on the Fair Use defense.

 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Comments

No comments so far.
 
Legal

Clancco, Clancco: The Source for Art & Law, Clancco.com, and Art & Law are trademarks owned by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento. The views expressed on this site are those of Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento and of the artists and writers who submit to Clancco.com. They are not the views of any other organization, legal or otherwise. All content contained on or made available through Clancco.com is not intended to and does not constitute legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is formed, nor is anything submitted to Clancco.com treated as confidential.

Website Terms of Use, Privacy, and Applicable Law.
 

Switch to our mobile site