Where Art and Law Collide: More on the Cariou v. Prince Case
Add another article to the list.
The Huffington Post’s Daniel Grant wonders if the Cariou v. Prince case will decide the “fate” of appropriation art. His article basically hammers in what we already know: that copyright law is a murky area, where the outcome of a fair use analysis is anyone’s guess.
MarcW:
January 6th, 2012 at 9:46 am
“the law hasn’t accepted two principals that are well understood in the art world. The first is that a change in medium is transformative.”
So I can print photographs of every sculpture Koons ever made on t-shirts and sell them without so much as a nod in his direction? I mean, that’s *doubly* transformative and therefore fair, right?