Friday, May 24, 2013
 

Where Art and Law Collide: More on the Cariou v. Prince Case

Add another article to the list.

The Huffington Post’s Daniel Grant wonders if the Cariou v. Prince case will decide the “fate” of appropriation art. His article basically hammers in what we already know: that copyright law is a murky area, where the outcome of a fair use analysis is anyone’s guess.

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments: 1

(comments are closed)

 
  • MarcW

    “the law hasn’t accepted two principals that are well understood in the art world. The first is that a change in medium is transformative.”

    So I can print photographs of every sculpture Koons ever made on t-shirts and sell them without so much as a nod in his direction? I mean, that’s *doubly* transformative and therefore fair, right?

     
     
     
 
Legal

Clancco, Clancco: The Source for Art & Law, and Clancco.com are trademarks owned by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento. The views expressed on this site are those of Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento and of the artists and writers who submit to Clancco.com. They are not the views of any other organization, legal or otherwise. All content contained on or made available through Clancco.com is not intended to and does not constitute legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is formed, nor is anything submitted to Clancco.com treated as confidential.

Website Terms of Use, Privacy, and Applicable Law.
Make a Tax-Deductible Donation

Making a small tax-deductible donation will help us continue to provide you with news articles and resources on art law. Donating is easy and can be done safely online. Clancco.com is fiscally sponsored by Fractured Atlas, a 501(c)(3) public charity, and thus all donations are tax-deductible to the extent permitted by law.

 

Switch to our mobile site