The Latest on the Gagosian Double-Dealing
January 18th, 2013 by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
In the end, Gagosian couldn’t prove to the magistrate judge that he legally represented Cowles in the sale, and therefore Cowles isn’t likely to be held responsible for any of the damages.
Via Artinfo.
Posted in Art Law, Contracts | No comments
Previous post: Is the Recreation of a Photo Copyright Infringement?
Next post: Kickstarter and the Growing Intellectual Property Problem