Wednesday, February 20, 2019

Is Copyright Maternal?

If you are one of those individuals that wondered why copyright, or intellectual property for that matter, was not doused with a bit of critical theory or CLS (better known as Critical Legal Studies), well, this is your lucky day. William Patry comments on the gendering of copyright as well as the problematic of birthing metaphors and binaries (pateral vs. maternal; body v. mind) via a few law review articles (which interestingly are from either the late 1980s, the height of the CLS movement, or within the last two years, the rebirth of CLS?).

Read the rest of this entry »


“They stole this from me! Well, I’m going to steal it right back.”

fvogue.jpgRichard Prince makes headlines again. Although we covered the photo dispute concerning some of Prince’s appropriated images exhibited at the Guggenheim last year (as well as artists upset over other artists appropriateing their work), this time it seems it is Prince himself who is a bit pissed that someone else is copying his aesthetic proclivities.

Read the rest of this entry »


Raiders of the Lost Arts

Seems like this was a weekend of repatriations and returned artifacts. The CBC reports that Jordan handed over nearly 2,500 stolen ancient artifacts to Iraq, most of which were smuggled out of the country by looters following the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003. Many of the artifacts have been turning up at art auctions around the world, and are believed to have been taken from the national museum in Baghdad, or looted from archeolgoical sites.

Otherwise, in today’s El Pais, a story detailing how the United States returned 900 pieces to Mexico’s Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia (National Institute of Anthropology and History). These 900 pieces are but a part of the 19,000 pieces recovered by Mexico in the last five years, most of the 19,000 from the U.S. alone. Mexico notes however that none of these 900 pieces were stolen from either museums or private collections, but rather were extracted from caves, small excavation sites, and non-archeological locations.


Architecture of Deconstruction

rmeier.jpg(Long Island Federal Courthouse, Richard Meier & Partners, Architects LLP)

Representations of lawyers, judges and courthouses abound in pop culture, and we are seeing more and more art projects that deal–directly or unfortunately–with law. Yet critical analysis of the physical structures of courthouses are not as frequently seen.

Read the rest of this entry »



Two interesting art and law stories come to us today from the Canadian Broadcasting Centre (CBC).

A Belgian-born writer claims many of Salvador Dali’s paintings are fakes, produced en masse by his assistants in order to support his lifestyle. “In his new book Dali And I: The Surreal Story, released in Spain this week, Stans Lauryssens claims that, in his later years, the painter authorized assistants to produce thousands of forgeries in his name, in order to fund his lavish lifestyle.” Countering these accusations, the Gala-Salvador Dali Foundation says it will take the “necessary legal action” against Lauryssens.

Read the rest of this entry »


The Jester’s Court

A good week for news of artists (and judges) making art with the aid of legal discourses. This year’s graduating MFA exibition from the California Institute of the Arts features one such project by Carlin Wing.

However, artists such as Carlin Wing were inspired not only by Chinatown’s reputation as a hip and popular art enclave, but also by its earlier history. Her outdoor chalk diagram piece “Four Courts” references the multiple meanings of the term “court” — from royalty and sports (Wing was a professional squash player) to architecture and judicial. The latter will be suggested in the form of a live reading related to an 80-year-old California Supreme Court decision that old Chinatown be razed to make room for Union Station. “I wanted to engage with the community here and the history,” Wing says.

Read more on the CalArts MFA exhibit at the LA Times.


Supreme Court Justice Turns Video Gamer

Sandra Day O’Connor, better known in legal circles as the swing and deciding vote in many a Rehnquist Court decision, is using her legal knowledge to create — videogames.

Read the rest of this entry »


Clancco, Clancco: The Source for Art & Law,, and Art & Law are trademarks owned by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento. The views expressed on this site are those of Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento and of the artists and writers who submit to They are not the views of any other organization, legal or otherwise. All content contained on or made available through is not intended to and does not constitute legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is formed, nor is anything submitted to treated as confidential.

Website Terms of Use, Privacy, and Applicable Law.

Switch to our mobile site