Sunday, July 23, 2017
 


Woman Fined for Kissing Cy Twombly


The BBC reported today that Cambodian-born Rindy Sam has been ordered to pay 1,500 euros in damages to the owner of the painting by a French judge. She must also pay a symbolic one euro to Twombly, as well as the gallery owner 500 euros.

“I just gave it a kiss. It was an act of love, when I kissed it, I wasn’t thinking. I thought the artist would understand,” she said.

Apparantly the fines for French kissing a painting are larger, and life-sentences are in order for sleeping with a painting, noted a renowned French art critic. However, flings with sculptures are not covered by French law.

 

Nussenzweig Loses–Again!


Third time is not a charm for old Erno Nussenzweig, the Hasidic Jewish man made famous by Philip Lorca di Corcia. The New York State Court of Appeals decided on Thursday, November 15, 2007, that Erno’s suit against di Corcia was barred by the statute of limitations as applicable to a right of privacy claim. The Court basically concluded that the statute of limitations begins to run on the first “date of publication,” and not on the first date that the plaintiff first discovered that her/his image was being used without consent. Thus a plaintiff must commence the suit within one year of first publication, and not within one year of first discovery. Although stupefying, the Court’s decision states that an artist/photographer has the right to exhibit any images of private individuals, without their consent, so long as the artist/photographer is crafty enough to keep these images from the wronged party, or better yet, so long as the artist/photographer takes pictures of private citizens who are not likely to hang out in Chelsea galleries. One wonders if these judges collect art.

Read the rest of this entry »

 

Photographing the Dead


A bit belated yet nonetheless timely, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in favor of photojournalist Peter Turnley and Harper’s Magazine by upholding a March 2007 decision of the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which found that Turnley had a First Amendment right to take a photograph of U.S. Army Spc. Kyle Brinlee’s open casket at a large public funeral in Oklahoma and Harper’s Magazine had the same right to publish it.

Brinlee was killed May 11, 2004, in Al Asad, Iraq, when his convoy struck an IED. More than 1,200 people attended his public funeral in a high school auditorium in Pryor, OK. Turnley photographed the funeral and pictures from it were part of an essay published in Harper’s Magazine in August 2004 in an essay titled “The Bereaved: Mourning the Dead, in America and Iraq.” Turnley’s photographic essay compared how the war dead are buried and mourned in American culture alongside similar images of how the war dead are buried and mourned in Iraqi culture.

Brinlee’s father, Robert Showler, and his maternal grandmother, Johnny Davidson, filed suit in April 2005. A federal judge in Oklahoma ruled in favor of Harper’s and Turnley citing First Amendment and state law protections. The plaintiffs appealed and an appeals court upheld the judgement, saying that Brinlee’s funeral was newsworthy and a matter of public interest.

 

Banksy the Prankster Caught on Camera


The BBC reported this morning that a photograph has surfaced which may contain the first actual image of Banksy (pronounced Bank-see) ever caught on celluloid (or digital bits). The image captures the would-be Banksy working on a London street with an assistant and the help of paint, tools, and scaffolding.

(Click on image to enlarge, Image courtesy of the BBC)

The photographer, who wishes to remain anonymous, is familiar with Banksy’s work and took the shot in Bethnal Green as she was passing the artist at work.

Click here for a little more on this story.

 

Costco and Bulk Counterfeits


The Los Angeles Times reported today, Friday, October 26th, that the mammoth bulk-seller corporation known as Costco has reached a settlement agreement with artist, Cao Yong. Costco reached a settlement this week with Yong in an art-counterfeiting suit he had brought in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles. He claimed that the mammoth, members-only merchandising chain had sold phony prints of his paintings in Southern California and provided buyers with faked certificates deeming them “signed and numbered by the artist.”

Read the rest of this entry »

 

Richard Prince: A Mother Walks Into a Bar…


Regarding Richard Prince’s Guggenheim exhibition, Donn Zaretsky points to a past legal issue concerning Richard Prince and the once-young Brooke Shields. In 1975, Brooke’s mom, Terri Shields, gave photographer Garry Gross consent to use Brooke’s now famous image of her as a 10 year old standing in a bathtub. In the 1981 lawsuit, Shields v. Gross , Brooke commenced an action in tort and contract against Gross seeking compensatory and punitive damages and an injunction permanently enjoining Gross from any further use of the photographs. She lost. The issue at hand was weather or not an infant model may disaffirm a prior unrestricted consent executed on her behalf by her parent and maintain an action against her photographer for republication of photographs of her.

brooke.jpg

Read the rest of this entry »

 

Rotting Flowers and VARA


From Donn Zaretsky and Ed Winkelman comes good news for artists. After the dismal MASS MoCA decision, the artist Chapman Kelley has won a dispute with the Chicago Park District in federal court, in a case that bears on what can be classified as a work of art under the law.

Read the rest of this entry »

 
 
Legal

Clancco, Clancco: The Source for Art & Law, Clancco.com, and Art & Law are trademarks owned by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento. The views expressed on this site are those of Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento and of the artists and writers who submit to Clancco.com. They are not the views of any other organization, legal or otherwise. All content contained on or made available through Clancco.com is not intended to and does not constitute legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is formed, nor is anything submitted to Clancco.com treated as confidential.

Website Terms of Use, Privacy, and Applicable Law.
 

Switch to our mobile site