Thursday, April 25, 2024
 
 

Roberta Smith on San Francisco’s Disputed George Washington Murals

August 6th, 2019 in Feature / Free Speech
Skip to comments (0) ↓
 

In a democracy, destroying a work of art is never a solution to any offense it may give. Once art has been made and released into the often choppy flow of life, it should stay there. It will live on anyway. To dictate its elimination is an implicitly autocratic move, similar in spirit, if not scale, to the deliberate demolition of ancient art and artifacts by the Taliban and the Islamic State.

More here.

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

This entry was posted on Tuesday, August 6th, 2019 at 4:06 pm and is filed under Feature, Free Speech. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments

No comments so far.
 
Legal

Clancco, Clancco: The Source for Art & Law, Clancco.com, and Art & Law are trademarks owned by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento. The views expressed on this site are those of Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento and of the artists and writers who submit to Clancco.com. They are not the views of any other organization, legal or otherwise. All content contained on or made available through Clancco.com is not intended to and does not constitute legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is formed, nor is anything submitted to Clancco.com treated as confidential.

Website Terms of Use, Privacy, and Applicable Law.
 

Switch to our mobile site