Bikinis be gone or, the 9th Circuit in serious need of mental acuity
July 13th, 2019 by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
“In keeping with the prurient theme, this month’s [9th Circuit Court of Appeals] ruling turned in part on the Everett law’s ban on the public display of some portions of a worker’s ‘anal cleft.'”
Reason’s Baylen Linnekin on this week’s prurient ruling.
Posted in Free Speech | Comments Off on Bikinis be gone or, the 9th Circuit in serious need of mental acuity
Previous post: “I came back with a firm understanding that Arnautoff was really not a person who was trying to venerate George Washington—or rather that he made a picture that venerated George Washington, but from the standpoint of a serious critique.”
Next post: Ai Weiwei triumphs over corporate “impunity”