Why Roseanne’s Firing Is Not a Free-Speech Issue
May 30th, 2018 by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
The First Amendment protects us from facing consequences from the government over our speech, not consequences from our peers or our employers. Yes, what Barr said, although abhorrent, absolutely was constitutionally protected speech, and, of course, it should be.
More here.
Posted in Employment, Free Speech | Comments Off on Why Roseanne’s Firing Is Not a Free-Speech Issue
Previous post: From idea to screen, what is copyrightable?
Next post: Should dead artists continue to make art, after they’re, you know, dead?