Friday, September 24, 2021
 

Copyright and Free Speech at the Supreme Court?


The Supreme court has been petitioned to overrule the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in the infamous “dancing baby” case where it was decided “no matter how unreasonable that belief,” copyright holders could use their own standards to decide if a use was infringing. The short video, posted to youtube, showed a baby dancing to a Prince song. YouTube removed the video for copyright infringement per Universal’s request.

The lawsuit comes from the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF). EFF’s Staff Attorney, Corynne McSherry, reportedly stated; “copyright holders should be held accountable when they undermine non-infringing fair uses like this video.”

The petition is part of EEF’s mission to protect the first amendment, often stunted by spurious copyright disputes. McSherry commented on the Supreme Court petition, lamenting that the Ninth Circuit ruling allows copyright holders to send take down notices “based on nothing more than an unreasonable hunch, or subjective criteria they simply made up must be held accountable.”

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

No comments so far.
 
Legal

Clancco, Clancco: The Source for Art & Law, Clancco.com, and Art & Law are trademarks owned by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento. The views expressed on this site are those of Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento and of the artists and writers who submit to Clancco.com. They are not the views of any other organization, legal or otherwise. All content contained on or made available through Clancco.com is not intended to and does not constitute legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is formed, nor is anything submitted to Clancco.com treated as confidential.

Website Terms of Use, Privacy, and Applicable Law.
 

Switch to our mobile site