Saturday, November 27, 2021
 

When It Comes to Philanthropy, Is the Nonprofit Dead?


LLC-Zuckerberg-charitySince I started working with arts nonprofits (startups and established ones), I’ve become increasingly suspect of the tax-exempt model, usually called the 501(c)(3). There are too many constraints to this model, particularly when it comes to the nonprofit’s ability to adjust to the complex nature of the global art world and business practices. Let’s face it, a nonprofit is a business.

Just because a nonprofit must have a public purpose, and an arts nonprofit has a particular art-related public mission (e.g.- making an artist’s work available to the general public or having educational programming for the general public) doesn’t mean it cannot think like a for-profit. In fact, I would say that after the 2008 financial downturn, if arts nonprofits want to not only survive, but thrive, it is crucial that they think like a for-profit.

The for-profit/non-profit misunderstanding begins with the name allocated to a tax-exempt entity, that of “nonprofit.” But all that means, in general, is that a nonprofits revenues do not serve a private purpose or provide a private benefit (this in itself is a complicated issue, but generally what it means is that there are no shareholders but a nonprofit could provide meals to homeless individuals, certainly a private benefit, but you get the point). Nonprofit does not mean that a tax-exempt entity is supposed to struggle financially, live on shoe-string budget or, worse, always end up with a deficit. The Museum of Modern Art in New York is a nonprofit, and so is the New Museum, and both are certainly not struggling financially (at least not to my knowledge).

The New York Times published an article last week (Dec. 2nd) on how Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla, have formed a limited liability company to manage their philanthropic interests rather than the usual nonprofit vehicle, such as a private foundation. So why the so-called, LLC? There are quite a few benefits to the LLC, such as tax perks, but also that owners of an LLC will maintain more control of the entity as well as ownership of the entity’s property, particularly its intellectual property. How it wishes to spend it’s money is also a huge perk; it can now invest or donate, a huge difference.

I’ve noticed an increase in wealthy individuals’ desires to establish their own philanthropic entities rather than simply donating to established nonprofits. Given the current financial health, even visual artists are establishing their own philanthropic entities (see Mark Bradford’s, for example). It will be interesting to see how the LLC model works and who else appropriates that model.

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

No comments so far.
  • Leave a Reply
     
    Your gravatar
    Your Name
     
     
     

     
     
 
Legal

Clancco, Clancco: The Source for Art & Law, Clancco.com, and Art & Law are trademarks owned by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento. The views expressed on this site are those of Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento and of the artists and writers who submit to Clancco.com. They are not the views of any other organization, legal or otherwise. All content contained on or made available through Clancco.com is not intended to and does not constitute legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is formed, nor is anything submitted to Clancco.com treated as confidential.

Website Terms of Use, Privacy, and Applicable Law.
 

Switch to our mobile site