Saturday, June 23, 2018

Another Confusing Cariou v. Prince ‘Review’

Here’s another ‘review’ of the Cariou v. Prince 2nd Circuit decision, and it’s just as confused and confusing as all previous others. I’m not saying that the writer, Dan Nabel, is inept or a bad writer, but simply that this continuing trend of superficial ‘reviews’ lends credence to the fact that the 2nd Circuit opinion is so confusing and nonsensical, to the point that if a lay reader were to read this or most previous reviews, they would be clueless as to what the outcome of the 2nd Circuit opinion actually said. In lay terms, what the hell is the conclusion?


Tags: , , , , , , , ,


No comments so far.
  • Leave a Reply
    Your gravatar
    Your Name


Clancco, Clancco: The Source for Art & Law,, and Art & Law are trademarks owned by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento. The views expressed on this site are those of Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento and of the artists and writers who submit to They are not the views of any other organization, legal or otherwise. All content contained on or made available through is not intended to and does not constitute legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is formed, nor is anything submitted to treated as confidential.

Website Terms of Use, Privacy, and Applicable Law.

Switch to our mobile site