<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the Recreation of a Photo Copyright Infringement?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clancco.com/wp/2013/01/facts-substantial-similarity-copyright/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clancco.com/wp/2013/01/facts-substantial-similarity-copyright/</link>
	<description>The Source for Art &#38; Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 03:01:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krupa</title>
		<link>http://clancco.com/wp/2013/01/facts-substantial-similarity-copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-21119</link>
		<dc:creator>Krupa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 02:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clancco.com/wp/?p=5692#comment-21119</guid>
		<description>I believe there is no copyright infringement in this case. The two pictures may seem similar but only because of the composition but since they have different backgrounds or there are missing elements, it is not entirely copying the original picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe there is no copyright infringement in this case. The two pictures may seem similar but only because of the composition but since they have different backgrounds or there are missing elements, it is not entirely copying the original picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
