Friday, October 24, 2014
 

Should Intellectual Property Rights be the New Civil Rights in America?

Well, in the last thirty years, there has been a shift from a labor economy to a knowledge economy. Consequently, intangible assets (with IPR being chief among them) have emerged as the most powerful asset class, overtaking more traditional capital assets such as real estate, plant and equipment.  … Thus, if the civil rights movement is to continue – a movement that was about righting economic disparities – focusing on IP as the 21st century economic rights makes sense.

I’ve noted and written about this before, and interestingly, after Obama’s re-election, there was this interesting blog entry by Chris Bickerton and Alex Gourevitch about the disconnect between Obama’s crafting of identity politics and the economy. Indeed, the rebirth of identity politics is disturbing enough, highlighting at best a regression to 1993 and, at worst, a championing of the “victim” mentality.

What is interesting to note about Raymond Millien’s article, The Real McCoy: Should Intellectual Property Rights be the New Civil Rights in America?, is that it doesn’t look to simply reignite the definitions of “minority” for social, cultural, and political gain. Rather, it addresses what Bickerton and Gourevitch observe by connecting the economic and socio-cultural disparities via intellectual property. By doing so, it indirectly attacks the pro-free culture movement, unveiling what is to most either unseen or, if seen, too disturbing to address: the fact that the pro-free culture movement is in fact a neo-liberal crusade willing to trade economic parity for cultural pipe dreams.

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments: 2

(comments are closed)

 
  • Liberty was a ‘pipe dream’ of slaves too you know…

     
     
     
  • Crosbie,
    I think you’re misunderstanding my point. It’s not against equal rights; rather, that in effect the “free culture” movement affects the economic equal rights that intellectual property allows for “minority” parties.

     
     
     
 
Legal

Clancco, Clancco: The Source for Art & Law, Clancco.com, and Art & Law are trademarks owned by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento. The views expressed on this site are those of Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento and of the artists and writers who submit to Clancco.com. They are not the views of any other organization, legal or otherwise. All content contained on or made available through Clancco.com is not intended to and does not constitute legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is formed, nor is anything submitted to Clancco.com treated as confidential.

Website Terms of Use, Privacy, and Applicable Law.
 

Switch to our mobile site