Thursday, April 18, 2024
 

Should Depiction of Animal-Related Crimes Be Unconstitutional?


Eugene Volokh, of The Volokh Conspiracy, has just uploaded the amicus brief he and two other lawyers wrote on behalf of the National Coalition Against Censorship and the College Art Association. The case is U.S. v. Stevens, where the U.S. Supreme Court will consider whether to create a new exception to the First Amendment’s free speech clause, allowing the government to make it a crime to sell videotapes or other depictions of animal cruelty.

You can read the amicus (pdf version) here. The reader may want to take a close look at page 11, where the amicus focuses on “avant-garde and conceptual art,” drawing on Duchamp, Herman Nitsch, and Wim Delvoye’s tattooed pigs.

 

Tags: , , ,

Comments

No comments so far.
  • Leave a Reply
     
    Your gravatar
    Your Name
     
     
     

     
     
 
Legal

Clancco, Clancco: The Source for Art & Law, Clancco.com, and Art & Law are trademarks owned by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento. The views expressed on this site are those of Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento and of the artists and writers who submit to Clancco.com. They are not the views of any other organization, legal or otherwise. All content contained on or made available through Clancco.com is not intended to and does not constitute legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is formed, nor is anything submitted to Clancco.com treated as confidential.

Website Terms of Use, Privacy, and Applicable Law.
 

Switch to our mobile site