Sunday, March 7, 2021
 

Authenticity: “it depends which expert you are talking to”


A Clancco reader, Jeff Stark, commented on a previous story detailing the legal battle between John Chamberlain and Gerard Malanga regarding an alleged fake Warhol. Stark pointed us to a website by Joe Simon-Whelan, which delineates Simon-Whelan’s battle against the Warhol foundation, their dealer Vincent Fremont and its arm the Andy Warhol Art Authentication Board Inc.

On October 11th, The Financial Times’ Georgina Adams wrote a lengthy article on the authenticating process of art works, and the legal issues and lawsuits raised by this seemingly random and chaotic process. Simon-Whelan’s lawsuit is mentioned here, along with three other authentication lawsuits.

  • London-based film producer Joe Simon-Whelan is entrenched in a long-running $120m lawsuit against the Andy Warhol Art Authentication Board. A 1964 Warhol self-portrait had been authenticated when he bought it in 1989 for $195,000, but was subsequently twice rejected by the board, that was set up in 1995. He says the portrait is now unsaleable.
  • Andy Warhol’s one-time assistant Gerard Malanga has filed a $5m lawsuit against the US sculptor John Chamberlain. Chamberlain sold a 1967 silkscreen, “315 Johns”, which the Warhol board has declared genuine, but Malanga alleges the work was made by Malanga himself, with two friends.
  • A Swedish art collector has taken the Basquiat Authentication Committee to court in a $10m action. By refusing to give an opinion on a painting, “Fuego Flores” (1983), the committee has allegedly reduced its value from $3m to “less than $5,000”.
  • Jörg Immendorff’s “Café de Flore” (1990-91) was withdrawn from a Munich auction after the German dealer Michael Werner raised issues of authenticity. Werner alleged that it was created by assistants in the artist’s studio.

Adams asks: So how do you find out if your artwork is genuine?

There is simply no sure-fire way of authenticating art, once the artist has died. It’s not that the means are lacking; in fact there is a host of expertise available. But there are “good” and “bad” specialists, reliable and unreliable books, scholarly rivalry, fake certificates and in-conclusive scientific tests. Even the top specialists aren’t infallible: the Getty in Los Angeles still doesn’t know whether its renowned marble kouros is a Greek masterpiece dating from about 530BC or a modern forgery.

Even asking recognised specialists is not always a solution. A famous rivalry opposed Michael Jaffé and Julius Held, both renowned scholars. If one pronounced a Rubens genuine, the other doubted it – and vice versa.

 

Tags: , , ,

Comments

No comments so far.
  • Leave a Reply
     
    Your gravatar
    Your Name
     
     
     

     
     
 
Legal

Clancco, Clancco: The Source for Art & Law, Clancco.com, and Art & Law are trademarks owned by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento. The views expressed on this site are those of Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento and of the artists and writers who submit to Clancco.com. They are not the views of any other organization, legal or otherwise. All content contained on or made available through Clancco.com is not intended to and does not constitute legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is formed, nor is anything submitted to Clancco.com treated as confidential.

Website Terms of Use, Privacy, and Applicable Law.
 

Switch to our mobile site