Monday, August 26, 2019
 

Can Orangutans Own Intellectual Property?


NPR reported recently that “[s]everal zoos across the country now sell paintings done by animals. The Houston Zoo, for example, offers a $500 experience, in which you can sit and watch an orangutan make a painting just for you.”

We couldn’t help but wonder: Who owns the copyright to the orangutan’s painting?

chimp.paint.jpg

(Chimp putting finishing touches on painting for 2008 Whitney Biennial)

We think there are a four options (with the first being the winner).

One, the orangutan owns the copyright, primarily because copyright law grants protection to the “author,” and doesn’t mention “person,” “human being,” or upright primate sans tail. Two, if the orangutan is found to be an employee of the zoo, then the zoo owns the copyright. Think about it, in this day and age the monkey could be found to be a performer who received compensation and workman’s comp for his dangerous duties. Three, if the zoo and/or the zoo’s animal trainer aided the orangutan, then either the zoo or the trainer are joint authors with the orangutan, giving them both 100% copyright ownership (although more likely than not the zoo would own it here because the trainer aided the monkey as part of his employment duties); and four, we can certainly see a judge (perhaps one from Massachusetts), finding that the orangutan is an infant, and thus has full copyright ownership over his painting, but any business dealings will most likely be regulated by state laws (and thus directed and approved by the monkey’s caretakers and a state judge). For those of you thinking work-for-hire, good try but it doesn’t hold much water (at least in most states, but we can’t vouch for Massachusetts) because there wasn’t a written contract stipulating as such, and more importantly, because portraits are not covered by work-for-hire laws.

So, there you have it. The next legal case the U.S. Supreme Court will hear is whether or not the primate can license his copyrights, and to make matters a bit more interesting for Justice Scalia and Thomas will be weather or not the Visual Artist’s Rights Act (VARA) applies to orangutans, and whether or not the zoo can exhibit the orangutan’s paintings without her consent. Stay tuned!

 

Comments

No comments so far.
  • Leave a Reply
     
    Your gravatar
    Your Name
     
     
     

     
     
 
Legal

Clancco, Clancco: The Source for Art & Law, Clancco.com, and Art & Law are trademarks owned by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento. The views expressed on this site are those of Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento and of the artists and writers who submit to Clancco.com. They are not the views of any other organization, legal or otherwise. All content contained on or made available through Clancco.com is not intended to and does not constitute legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is formed, nor is anything submitted to Clancco.com treated as confidential.

Website Terms of Use, Privacy, and Applicable Law.
 

Switch to our mobile site